1.1 Aim of Dissertation
<标题> Urban theory and construction has been “in vogue” as a concept over the last decade, with the enlargement of the European Union, with the entrance of eastern block countries, we have seen the construction of EU economic and social policy embrace the necessity of macro and micro policies that have assisted and developed the sea ports of the Union. This interesting area provides a comparative basis for understanding some of the constructs of urban policy, in particular European Urban Policy.
<标题>In this respect, this dissertation will consider a comparison of the Port of Riga, a new Latvian entrant to the EU and the seasoned “veteran” port of Rotterdam, these two ports have similar constructs and are competitive rivals for inter world trade. These ports have similar geographical constructs and are urbanised within the European Union (EU). However, what is of interest is that, the Port of Riga is a new addition to the EU following EU enlargement in recent years. The Port of Rotterdam, has been part of the EU for over two decades and as such has been able to embrace the concept of urbanisation through the incentives provided through EU development, and urbanisation strategy that embraces, the socio-economic constructs of a large state that is Europe; to include the necessary concept of community sustainability, this concept can be seen in both the macro and micro construct .
1.2 Research Hypothesis
The hypothesis under consideration is: “Riga's port territories regeneration plan based on a comparative analysis with the port of Rotterdam ” With this hypothesis in mind we shall consider three specific areas of enquiry, firstly we shall conceptualize this study within a brief consideration of European Urban Theory exposed in literature; secondly, we will consider the rationale for a qualitative case study approach to methodological undertakings of this study; thirdly, we shall consider the research finding gained from a case study approach and finally, we shall then conceptualize the findings in relation to the literature and draw appropriate conclusions.
1.3 Structure of Dissertation
This dissertation will be divided into five chapters. First chapter is introduction.
Overall, having introduced the nature of the enquiry we can now proceed to consider briefly the current debate in literature.
<标题> CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
<标题>The nature of urban policy has in recent year been debated and discussed within academic circles to the point where this empirical debate now firmly conceptualizes within the study of both macro and micro models . The construction of the debate is too vast for this study therefore, we shall conceptualize the nature of the literary debate within European policy, that current impacts upon the nature of the regeneration of urban ports and their geographical and economic communities.
第一章：引言 1.1論文的目標 城市理論和建設一直是“時尚”作為一個概念在過去十年中，隨著歐盟擴大，東歐國家的入口，我們看到了歐盟的經濟和社會政策的建設樹立宏觀調控的必要性和微觀政策，協助和發展聯盟海港。這個有趣的地區提供了一個比較的基礎上，了解一些城市政策的結構，特別是歐洲城市政策。 在這方面，本文將考慮港口里加，拉脫維亞一個新的加入者歐盟和經驗豐富的“老將”鹿特丹港的比較，這兩個端口也有類似的結構和世界貿易間有競爭力的對手。這些端口也有類似的地理結構和城市化在歐洲聯盟（歐盟）。然而，什么是利益，里加港是一個新的除了歐盟近年來歐盟東擴后。鹿特丹港，一直是歐盟的一部分，超過二十年，因此一直能夠接受的概念通過歐盟的發展提供的激勵機制，通過城市化和城鎮化戰略，擁抱，一個大國的社會經濟結構是歐洲，包括必要的社區可持續發展的概念，這個概念可以看出，在宏觀和微觀結構。 1.2研究假設 正在考慮的假設是：“基于一個比較分析的港口鹿特丹”隨著這個假說記住我們應考慮三個查詢的特定區域上的里加的端口領土再生計劃，首先我們應概念化這項研究在歐洲城市的一個簡短的代價暴露在文學理論，其次，我們會考慮一個案件的定性研究方法的基本原理方法論本研究事業;第三，我們應考慮研究發現獲得的一個案例研究的方法，最后，我們再概念化的調查結果文獻并得出適當的結論。 1.3論文結構 本文將分為五章。第一章是緒論。 ......................... .......................... 總體而言，介紹查詢，現在我們可以繼續考慮一下目前的辯論文獻的性質。 第二章：文獻回顧 城市政策的性質已在最近的一年中一直爭論不休，并討論在學術界的實證辯論現在堅決概念化在宏觀和微觀兩個模型的研究。辯論的建設是過于龐大，因此這項研究，我們應當概念化文學的辯論在歐洲政策的性質，城市港口的再生和其地域和經濟共同體的性質后，目前影響。